ning with one another, and indeed with ourselves,Parajumpers Mężczyźni UGO, has been annihilated; for it is impossible to think of anything if we do not think of one thing; but if this is possible, one name might be assigned to this thing.)
Let it be assumed then,Chaussures New Balance 574, as was said at the beginning, that the name has a meaning and has one meaning; it is impossible, then, that ‘being a man’ should mean precisely ‘not being a man’,Maillot Cazorla Pas Cher, if ‘man’ not only signifies something about one subject but also has one significance (for we do not identify ‘having one significance’ with ‘signifying something about one subject’,Cameroun Pas Cher, since on that assumption even ‘musical’ and ‘white’ and ‘man’ would have had one significance, so that all things would have been one; for they would all have had the same significance).
And it will not be possible to be and not to be the same thing, except in virtue of an ambiguity, just as if one whom we call ‘man’, others were to call ‘not-man’; but the point in question is not this, whether the same thing can at the same time be and not be a man in name, but whether it can in fact. Now if ‘man’ and ‘not-man’ mean nothing different, obviously ‘not being a man’ will mean nothing different from ‘being a man’; so that ‘being a man’ will be ‘not being a man’; for they will be one. For being one means this-being related as ‘raiment’ and ‘dress’ are, if their definition is one. And if ‘being a man’ and ‘being a not-man’ are to be one,Chaussures New Balance 680, they must mean one thing. But it was shown earlier’ that they mean different things.-Therefore, if it is true to say of anything that it is a man, it must be a two-footed animal (for this was what ‘man’ meant); and if this is necessary,Belstaff Triumph Kurtki, it is impossible that the same thing should not at that time be a two-footed animal; for this is what ‘being necessary’ means-that it is impossible for the thing not to be. It is, then, impossible that it should be at the same time true to say the same thing is a man and is not a man.
The same account holds good with regard to ‘not being a man’, for ‘being a man’ and ‘being a not-man’ mean different things,Chaussures Nike Air Max 2016 Femme, since even ‘being white’ and ‘being a man’ are different; for the former terms are much more different so that they must a fortiori mean different things. And if any one says that ‘white’ means one and the same thing as ‘man’, again we shall say the same as what was said before,Bresil Pas Cher, that it would follow that all things are one,[url=http://www.le-guide-du-nord-pas-de-calais.fr/ligue-1-c-234/#PasCher">Ligue 1 Pas Cher[/url], and not only opposites. But if this is impossible,Dame Moncler Yaroy Norge Salg, then what we have maintained will follow, if our opponent will only answer our question.
And if, when one asks the question simply, he adds the contradictories, he is not answering the question. For there is nothing to prevent the same thing from being both a man and white and countless other things: but still, if one asks whether it is or is not true to say that this is a man,Air Jordan Retro 9 Męskie, our opponent must give an answer which means one thing,Chaussures Jordan CP3 Homme, and not add that ‘it is also white and large’.
相关的主题文章：
http://www.auctionzip.com/cgi-bin/auctionsearch.cgi
http://www.matsue-yado.com/otoku/clip.cgi
http://tsuruo.jp/cgi-def/admin/C-002/after/visit/main.pl?PAGE_NUM=1 |
