Forms in any of the usual senses of ‘from’. And to say that they are patterns and the other things share in them is to use empty words and poetical metaphors. For what is it that works, looking to the Ideas? And any thing can both be and come into being without being copied from something else, so that, whether Socrates exists or not, a man like Socrates might come to be. And evidently this might be so even if Socrates were eternal. And there will be several patterns of the same thing,Minnesota Vikings, and therefore several Forms; e.g. ‘animal’ and ‘two-footed’, and also ‘man-himself’, will be Forms of man. Again, the Forms are patterns not only of sensible things, but of Forms themselves also; i.e. the genus is the pattern of the various forms-of-a-genus; therefore the same thing will be pattern and copy.
Again, it would seem impossible that substance and that whose substance it is should exist apart; how,Nike Air Presto kengät Suomi, therefore, could the Ideas,Seattle Sounders FC Drakt, being the substances of things, exist apart?
In the Phaedo the case is stated in this way-that the Forms are causes both of being and of becoming. Yet though the Forms exist,Belstaff New Toxic Blouson Jackor, still things do not come into being, unless there is something to originate movement; and many other things come into being (e.g. a house or a ring) of which they say there are no Forms. Clearly therefore even the things of which they say there are Ideas can both be and come into being owing to such causes as produce the things just mentioned,Robert Lewandowski Tröja, and not owing to the Forms. But regarding the Ideas it is possible, both in this way and by more abstract and accurate arguments, to collect many objections like those we have considered.
Book XIII Chapter 6
Since we have discussed these points, it is well to consider again the results regarding numbers which confront those who say that numbers are separable substances and first causes of things. If number is an entity and its substance is nothing other than just number,Hugo Boss Tee, as some say, it follows that either (1) there is a first in it and a second,Toni Kroos Tröja, each being different in species,-and either (a) this is true of the units without exception, and any unit is inassociable with any unit, or (b) they are all without exception successive, and any of them are associable with any, as they say is the case with mathematical number; for in mathematical number no one unit is in any way different from another. Or (c) some units must be associable and some not; e.g. suppose that 2 is first after 1, and then comes 3 and then the rest of the number series, and the units in each number are associable, e.g. those in the first 2 are associable with one another, and those in the first 3 with one another, and so with the other numbers; but the units in the ‘2-itself’ are inassociable with those in the ‘3-itself’; and similarly in the case of the other successive numbers. And so while mathematical number is counted thus-after 1,Hoodies, 2 (which consists of another 1 besides the former 1), and 3 which consists of another 1 besides these two),Shooter Yd, and the other numbers similarly, ideal number is clinks:
http://share.digitalmax.jp/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=2345293&view=unread#unread
http://iced-esports.de/index.php?site=news_comments&newsID=1/
http://share.digitalmax.jp/bbs/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=652646&view=unread#unread |
