nce. And evidently the same is true of points and lines and planes; for the same argument applies, since they are all alike either limits or divisions.
Book III Chapter 6
In general one might raise the question why after all,Casual Tall Czyścibut 5804, besides perceptible things and the intermediates, we have to look for another class of things,UGG Bailey Button Czyścibut 5803, i.e. the Forms which we posit. If it is for this reason,Challenge Yd, because the objects of mathematics,Moncler Melina, while they differ from the things in this world in some other respect, differ not at all in that there are many of the same kind, so that their first principles cannot be limited in number (just as the elements of all the language in this sensible world are not limited in number,Short Sparkles Czyścibut 3161, but in kind, unless one takes the elements of this individual syllable or of this individual articulate sound-whose elements will be limited even in number; so is it also in the case of the intermediates; for there also the members of the same kind are infinite in number),Rivet Short Czyścibut 5829, so that if there are not-besides perceptible and mathematical objects-others such as some maintain the Forms to be,Woolrich Parka Ženy, there will be no substance which is one in number, but only in kind,Parajumpers Damen Light Long Bear, nor will the first principles of things be determinate in number, but only in kind:-if then this must be so,Germany Drakt, the Forms also must therefore be held to exist. Even if those who support this view do not express it articulately, still this is what they mean, and they must be maintaining the Forms just because each of the Forms is a substance and none is by accident.
But if we are to suppose both that the Forms exist and that the principles are one in number,Kurtki Woolrich, not in kind, we have mentioned the impossible results that necessarily follow.
(13) Closely connected with this is the question whether the elements exist potentially or in some other manner. If in some other way, there will be something else prior to the first principles; for the potency is prior to the actual cause, and it is not necessary for everything potential to be actual.-But if the elements exist potentially, it is possible that everything that is should not be. For even that which is not yet is capable of being; for that which is not comes to be, but nothing that is incapable of being comes to be.
(12) We must not only raise these questions about the first principles, but also ask whether they are universal or what we call individuals. If they are universal,leicester Drakt, they will not be substances; for everything that is common indicates not a ‘this’ but a ‘such’, but substance is a ‘this’. And if we are to be allowed to lay it down that a common predicate is a ‘this’ and a single thing, Socrates will be several animals-himself and ‘man’ and ‘animal’, if each of these indicates a ‘this’ and a single thing.
If, then,Męskie Barbour A7 Brass Kurtka, the principles are universals, these universal. Therefore if there is to be results follow; if they are not universals but of knowledge of the principles there must be the nature of individuals, they will not be other principles prior to them, namely those knowable; for the knowledge
相关的主题文章：
http://www.bulletin.corporatechrist.co.uk/
http://www.12316.sh.cn/cx/readnews.asp?NewsID=4311/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp/index.asp
http://121.ldustu.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=318 |
