consider what is said by others, so that,LA Clippers Drakter, if there is anything which they say wrongly, we may not be liable to the same objections, while,Hamburg Drakt, if there is any opinion common to them and us, we shall have no private grievance against ourselves on that account; for one must be content to state some points better than one’s predecessors, and others no worse.
Two opinions are held on this subject; it is said that the objects of mathematics-i.e. numbers and lines and the like-are substances,Belstaff Gangster Blouson Bunda, and again that the Ideas are substances. And (1) since some recognize these as two different classes-the Ideas and the mathematical numbers, and (2) some recognize both as having one nature, while (3) some others say that the mathematical substances are the only substances,Moncler Arcs, we must consider first the objects of mathematics,Denver Nuggets Drakter, not qualifying them by any other characteristic-not asking, for instance, whether they are in fact Ideas or not, or whether they are the principles and substances of existing things or not, but only whether as objects of mathematics they exist or not,Parajumpers Damen Long Bear Jacken Schweiz, and if they exist, how they exist. Then after this we must separately consider the Ideas themselves in a general way, and only as far as the accepted mode of treatment demands; for most of the points have been repeatedly made even by the discussions outside our school, and, further,Parajumpers Męskie Kodiak, the greater part of our account must finish by throwing light on that inquiry, viz. when we examine whether the substances and the principles of existing things are numbers and Ideas; for after the discussion of the Ideas this remans as a third inquiry.
If the objects of mathematics exist, they must exist either in sensible objects, as some say, or separate from sensible objects (and this also is said by some); or if they exist in neither of these ways,Russland Landslagsdrakt, either they do not exist, or they exist only in some special sense. So that the subject of our discussion will be not whether they exist but how they exist.
Book XIII Chapter 2
That it is impossible for mathematical objects to exist in sensible things, and at the same time that the doctrine in question is an artificial one, has been said already in our discussion of difficulties we have pointed out that it is impossible for two solids to be in the same place,Dallas Mavericks Drakter, and also that according to the same argument the other powers and characteristics also should exist in sensible things and none of them separately. This we have said already. But, further,Belstaff Taška, it is obvious that on this theory it is impossible for any body whatever to be divided; for it would have to be divided at a plane, and the plane at a line, and the line at a point, so that if the point cannot be divided, neither can the line, and if the line cannot, neither can the plane nor the solid. What difference,Polen Landslagsdrakt, then, does it make whether sensible things are such indivisible entities, or, without being so themselves, have indivisible entities in them? The result will be the same; if the sensible entities are divided the others will be divided too,Sanfrecce Hiroshima Drakt, or else not even the sensible entities
相关的主题文章：
http://www.zonp.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=12
http://books.boatdesign.net/bookstore/books.cgi
http://www.olginfo.com/discuz/viewthread.php?tid=438177&pid=517988&page=1&extra=page%3D1#pid517988 |
